Disease of Fear and Lies

Fear based public health kills. This phenomenon occurred in nursing homes across the western world. Long term care residents die of thirst and malnutrition, labeled Covid deaths.

John Gibson, Professor of Economics, teaches at the University of Waikato. He previously taught at the University of Canterbury and Williams College, was a research visitor at the Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford and is an Associate Researcher at the LICOS Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance at KU Leuven. He received his PhD from Stanford University and has since worked around the world in countries like Cambodia, China, India, Papua New Guinea, Russia, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Thailand, Tonga, Vanuatu, and Vietnam. He is a Fellow of the Royal Society of New Zealand and a Distinguished Fellow of the New Zealand Association of Economists and of the Australasian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.

Professor Gibson wrote this excellent article on the futility and harm of “lockdown” as a public health intervention of any merit. Which of course, as everyone knows, it is not. The best cherry pick from Lockdown Again, though there are many, is probably this:

  • Contrary to fear mongering, Delta variant is less lethal than earlier variants.
    Becoming more infectious is not the same as becoming more lethal. It is usually the opposite as anyone who studied Virology 101 knows. Delta is no exception. Neither will the pre-named future variants of Sigma, Lambda, Mu et al, be. Stop fearing the variants.

Responding to fear mongering is becoming a permanent feature for those working in the arena of infectious diseases who have not yet been entirely captured by our global powerbrokers and their meteoric rise. On 8 September 2021 the Australian and New Zealand Paediatric Infectious Disease Group (ANZPID) issued a statement in response to fears from media reports of hundreds of Australian children “hospitalised with Delta”. Many of these hospitalisations were for social reasons, particularly ill parents unable to care for children, so hospitalisation statistics do not provide a good marker of severity. Although one death was recorded, the child in question was a 15yo boy being treated for bacterial meningitis.

Similar position statements have been announced elsewhere, for example the UK in June 2021 following dishonest reports of paediatric wards being overwhelmed:

UCSF Epidemiologist Professor Vinay Prasad speaks out for children at great personal expense. He is constantly attacked and vilified by those with no logic or analysis.

The health of children across the globe is threatened in irreparable ways by the harm of this mainstream consensus narrative of fear mongering which serves to maintain support for lockdown policies. Childhood vaccination programs are halted; Measles and other outbreaks are being reported; nutrition programs are halted; famine is establishing itself across the world; schooling is halted except for the tiny minority with access to internet and computers; levels of child abuse and human trafficking are high whilst reports and protective services are halted; treatments for other conditions are halted. All in the name of “public health”!

Lockdown policy is a crime against humanity. Eventually everyone will claim to have never supported it. Much as the whole of German society was innocent to any wrongdoing once 1945 rolled around.

An International Covid Summit was held from 12 to 14 September in Rome, Italy, recordings of which should be available soon. “We brought the A Team of physicians and medical scientists from around the world together. We all see what’s going on. And we’re in this pivotal moment within society right now, a kind of 1776 moment of ‘this is time to fight for the patients and for freedom’. Let doctors be doctors. Let scientists be scientists. Not be beholden to big systems that are costing patients their lives by witholding safe, effective, early treatments.” ~ Dr Ryan Cole

Meanwhile the Gates Foundation plan to reach “the final solution“, to vaccinate the whole globe with what are showing themselves to be less than effective, less than safe substances, marches on unimpeded as most remain erroneously convinced that their children are at risk. Eventually those hurling ad hominem around regarding the characters of those speaking out against this, whilst supporting Big Power, will claim they never knew. Now is your time to “know”.

Karen Harradine’s four part article about the global power of Bill Gates in The Conservative Woman

Human Ecoystems Need Exposure

I am hopeful PANDA will publish this, or an edited version. Meanwhile it seems worth sharing here. It demonstrates the dangers of poor public health interventions.

Interestingly mainstream media, likely due to their lack of investigative ability rather than something sinister, have claimed that NZ were “ZeroRSV” until unquarantined Australian arrivals brought it back into the country. This article explains why an established, widely circulating virus would not have reverted to “status zero” and that in fact, it’s our immune system health that is the reason for our current RSV (and other respiratory viruses) epidemic.

Human Ecosystems Need Exposure

On 16 March 2020 the Director General of World Health Organisation Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus announced at a press conference in GenevaWe have a simple message to all countries – test, test, test”.  He went on to claim that without testing of all suspected COVID-19 cases, they could not be isolated and the chain of infection could not be broken.  He also stated on 24 May 2021 that the pandemic “will not be over until and unless transmission is controlled in every last country”.

As a result of these test and trace concepts, mass SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing has been undertaken globally.  In unwell individuals there has been a fixation on SARS-CoV-2 testing to the exclusion of other possible diagnoses.  Healthy individuals have been forced to take tests, quarantine, stay home, close businesses, wear masks, socially distance and follow many other locally determined lockdown policies.  This response ignores the fact that sickness occurs almost exclusively in the elderly and those whose immune systems are already frail due to pre-existing chronic conditions.  Measures to protect the vulnerable would have been a much more targeted and realistic objective whilst causing far less societal devastation.

With a highly transmissible respiratory virus causing minimal symptoms in most individuals the lockdown response also ignores the complex microscopic ecosystem which humans unwittingly host. Defined as an organ in its own right, the human microbiome consists of communities of microbes (bacteria, viruses and fungi) residing in and on the human body.  The viruses in our microbiome are known as the “virome” and those communities of viruses which move in and out of our respiratory tract over time via the mere act of breathing, are known as the “respiratory virome”.

The sole aim of the organisms in our microbiome is their own survival, which is assisted in various ways by the human body hosting them.  Harming their host is also harmful to the organisms themselves, who rely on human life for survival.  Any harm an infectious agent causes to the hosts they move amongst tends to be incidental and usually relates to the individual’s health status and ability to mount an immune response.  As an example, SARS-CoV-2 cannot easily establish itself in an immature immune system for multiple reasons, meaning children are at extremely low risk of Covid-19 disease (Reference).  Simultaneously, the same immaturity which protects against Covid-19 makes children more susceptible to other respiratory diseases such as Influenza.

The respiratory virome consists of a combination of potentially harmful viruses, viruses with an unknown ability for harm, and viruses which protect our health by competing against and damaging or killing other potentially harmful microbes.  Potentially harmful viruses can help the immune system when exposure occurs at a time in life when there is minimal risk of developing disease by training it to recognise and fight the organism.  Developing immunity without becoming unwell is the ideal scenario.

Healthy newborn babies have complete but immature immune systems which rely on exposure from the moment of birth in order to develop.  Within the first few hours of life, a large number of microbes establish on newborn skin, in the oral cavity and gut, and in the respiratory tract (reference).  Exposure occurs via close maternal contact beginning with birth occurring next to the anus, ensuring large amounts of maternal gut flora transfer to the baby immediately.  A mother then touches, breathes on and remains in close personal contact with her baby almost constantly.  Because maternal immunity is passed onto the baby via the bloodstream antenatally, and via breastmilk postnatally, babies have temporary immunity to the microbes this contact exposes them to.  This provides time and training for the newborn immune system to develop independently.

Exposure can also be a risk to infant health due to the fragility of immature immune systems.  Respiratory infections are a leading cause of illness and death in infancy.  Close contact with healthy individuals offers low-risk exposures giving the infant’s immune system time and practice to develop and mature.  Promoting immune health by practices such as exclusive breastfeeding, adequate sleep and low levels of stress, are important protective mechanisms.

An example of viral transmission dynamics and human health is the reinfection which occurs throughout the human lifespan with Respiratory Syncytial Virus.  Abbreviated to RSV, this virus is a significant component of the respiratory virome.  It is also the main viral cause of lower respiratory tract infections worldwide (Reference).  The first infection with RSV in early life is usually the most severe.  Subsequent reinfections tend to be milder, due partly to protective immunity resulting from prior infection.

A lifetime of reinfection with RSV confers levels of antibodies in the pregnant woman, which passes to the unborn baby and lasts for a number of months after birth.  As this passive immunity wanes, the infant becomes susceptible to disease when exposed.  Most infants experience their first RSV related illness between nine months to two years of age (Reference).  Up to 3% of these primary infections require hospitalisation (Reference) and globally up to 200,000 children under the age of five die due to RSV infection each year (Reference).  Reinfection occurs throughout the lifespan and most infections after the age of five tend to be mild until the immune system becomes frail either from older age or due to immune suppression such as during chemotherapy treatment.

When enough of a population have at least partial immunity to a potentially harmful organism, vulnerable populations are more likely to be protected than in populations where immunity is diminished.  This demonstrates the important role that our microbiome and its components including the respiratory virome, play in human health.  Two excellent examples of this are outlined below in relation to Covid-19 and RSV.

A study in Scotland in 2020 (Reference) found that adults living in households with health care workers were at less risk from Covid-19 disease if children were also living in the household. As the numbers of resident children increased, the risk of Covid-19 disease in household contacts reduced.  This supports a likely hypothesis that children carry tiny amounts of SARS-CoV-2 virus in their respiratory virome, and that transmission from children to adults is protective rather than harmful.

In July 2021 New Zealand and Australia, who have both been lauded for their lockdown and social distancing practices in response to the Covid-19 pandemic, have reported high rates of children being hospitalised with RSV infection.  Lockdown practices may have reduced exposures to SARS-CoV-2, although there are other possibilities for the pattern of Covid-19 disease in this region.  However, outbreaks of RSV suggest that respiratory viromes have also had less exposure to other viruses which, when present in enough of the population, normally offer protection to vulnerable groups who now face higher risk of disease due to lack of population immunity.

In conclusion, therefore, it can be seen that within the delicate microscopic ecosystems which human populations inhabit, the obstruction of exposure to a range of viruses can threaten, rather than protect, human health.  The idea promoted by World Health Organisation, that testing healthy individuals and taking extreme efforts at great societal cost to block all transmission of one virus which harms a very specific risk group, seems ultimately to have been more detrimental than beneficial to population health.

Coming for the Children

Anyone ignoring the exposé on Dr Anthony Fauci of NIAID in the USA is ignoring a humanitarian crime of a scale that surpasses anything ever experienced. Judy Mikovits talks about her experiences working with the cartel Fauci has installed under the guise of providing a public health service on taxpayer funds at The Highwire, here. Dr David Martin has described Fauci’s cartel activities in great detail as I have shared previously (Where is the reporting on any of this?)

It is a fact of Covid-19 disease that children are not at risk. Why is Covid-19 less severe in children, British Medical Journal explains the multi-factorial reasons for this. Sharing a household with children and risk of Covid-19, British Medical Journal explains how the more children there are in a household, the higher the protective levels against Covid-19 their adult contacts have.

So why has Dr Fauci just stated that children over the age of two years old are recommended to wear masks? He gives one condition. Unvaccinated children. When you note his power over the $6 billion budget which he shuffles between university drug development and gain of function research projects, and the Big Pharmaceutical companies lining up to receive the contracts he coordinates, then the interviews he has given over the past few days make sense. Unvaccinated children.

In places like Cambodia lockdown is now killing children from malnutrition and malnutrition-related disease. Diagnosis is largely unavailable as health care is even less accessible to the poor because of lockdown. “Health care” is now “Covid care”, as I have already described. Testing kits, testing machines, medications and other “public health” paraphernalia are already an important element of the new economy establishing itself as the poorest starve to death.

Every presentation to any health care facility is mandated a SARS-CoV-2 test. Noone considers that every individual has a respiratory virome replete with many millions of virus traces. That is the nature of our respiratory cavities; that many “diseases” move in and out of our respiratory tract via the mere act of breathing. This interaction usually causes no harm, and in fact has benefits such as promoting immunity. There is no testing for Influenza, Adenovirus, Rhinovirus, RSV, Metapneumovirus, Para-influenza or the multitude other viruses which pass in and out of our respiratory tract many times during our lifespan. They usually cause no harm in healthy individuals, but they can and do cause respiratory disease, especially in children, under certain conditions relating to the individual’s immune system at a given point in time.

Every one of these viruses may now cause a global pandemic should our esteemed “public health” agencies decide to engage in fearmongering and call for virus-specific testing in the quest to “diagnose cases”. The pseudo-epidemic characteristics promoted by the current public health response to Covid-19 has been well described for many months now by Dr Clare Craig and a range of other experts in virology, immunology, diagnostics and PCR testing. In the impoverished world, where lack of disease surveillance systems and quality diagnostics makes Covid-19 focused services far easier to impose, these pseudo-epidemic characteristics can become a roaring success.

Cambodia, led by US CDC and WHO, have today ramped up SARS-CoV-2 testing of children. Any child presenting for health care for any reason must have a SARS-CoV-2 test. Any child contact of any age living with a “Covid case” (ie someone with a SARS-CoV-2 positive test, regardless of symptoms) must be swabbed. Lockdown propaganda is everywhere: “if you leave home, and your child subsequently ‘gets Covid’, then that’s your fault”. Impoverished people seeking ways to feed their children must be admonished and punished for not caring about their children’s health. Where is my sanity misunderstanding this merry-go-round of terror?

Unvaccinated children. Long-established tyranny of a war torn, Communist nation ensures parents and families will obey. This tyranny has ensured very low health literacy in the general population. The bio-medical fascism rolling out globally is most easily executed when tyranny is already installed. Evidence based public health is obviously unnecessary as seen by similarly low quality politicised practices happening globally. World Health Organisation and Centers for Disease Control wield enormous, unquestionable power when people are desperate to receive quality care, and where expatriate reputations are gold.

These crimes against humanity are playing out with our collective permission. Should we really be so afraid of this one virus? What does a positive SARS-CoV-2 test actually mean? Does it really define a “case” of disease? What are the excess death numbers in any country over the past year that support claims we are living through a deadly pandemic? What are the risks associated with the experimental vaccine rollout? What risks do children really face in this pandemic? What are the connections between powerful pandemic players such as Dr Fauci and the pharmaceutical industry; Dr Tedros and Xi Jinping; Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab? Big Tech and Mainstream Media? Are these people really motivated by doing good for humanity?

This tragedy could be stopped before it gets any worse. But we need to deprogram a propagandised globe first.

PANDA Declaration for the Protection of Children and Young People From the Covid-19 Response.

It’s a personal mission of mine to see Tony Fauci walk off in handcuffs” ~ Del Bigtree
Multiple others must share his chains ~ Me

Public Health or Public Harm?

Covering Up an Epidemic : a trusted advisor?

When babies fell ill in Brazil with respiratory illness recently there was no suite of respiratory testing available.

There was only SARS-CoV-2 PCR. A test acknowledged by those following quality public health evidence as not-fit-for-purpose, with a complicated picture of false positivity. This is explained in lay-friendly terms by Dr Clare Craig at A Miscarriage of Diagnosis. And so almost 1,000 Brazilian babies “died of Covid” in this year’s lockdown-worsened respiratory virus season.

Today in New Zealand children are experiencing an epidemic of Respiratory Syncytial Virus, an infection far more dangerous to children than Covid. NZ hospitals are under mounting pressure. They use a suite of testing unavailable in impoverished health systems and not used in Covid’s carpark testing stations. NZ’s suffering babies are unlikely to experience the Covid horror that played out on Brazil’s children under the excited eye of a parasitic media. Without a Covid diagnosis, their suffering will go largely unnoticed.

Lockdowns make everything worse. Our children – and all of us – deserve better than this nonsense.

End Lockdowns.

Why is Covid-19 less severe in children?

New Zealand Herald 26 June 2021